Blood Rose Manor
February 11, 2025, 07:41:37 pm
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
  Home Help Arcade Gallery Staff List Login Register  

Texas homeowner acquitted of killing teen intruder

Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Texas homeowner acquitted of killing teen intruder  (Read 118 times)
blueyes
Crown holder
Royalty
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 7774




Badges: (View All)
« on: September 28, 2008, 07:54:05 pm »

 A Texas jury acquitted a man accused of killing a boy who broke into his home looking for a snack — a case that sparked outrage in this border city, where many thought the man should not have even been charged.

It took the jury of eight men and four women three hours Friday to find Jose Luis Gonzalez, 63, not guilty of murdering Francisco Anguiano, who was 13 when he and three friends broke into Gonzalez's trailer to rummage for snacks and soda one night in July 2007.

"I thank God and my attorney, the jury and the judge," Gonzalez said in Spanish after the verdict. "It was a case where it was my life or theirs, and it's a very good thing that they (the jurors) decided in my favor."

Gonzalez said he was sorry for Anguiano's death, but "it was a situation in which I feared for my life."

Texas law allows homeowners to use deadly force to protect themselves and their property. In June, a grand jury in Houston cleared a homeowner who shot and killed two burglars outside his neighbor's house despite the dispatcher's repeated request that he stay inside his own home.

"I feel vindicated for Mr. Gonzalez and his family and for all of the homeowners and all of the seniors in Laredo," said Isidro "Chilo" Alaniz, Gonzalez's attorney. "This case has huge implications across the board. We always, always believed in Mr. Gonzalez's right to defend his life and his property."

Alaniz is running uncontested for Webb County district attorney in November.

However, Assistant District Attorney Uriel Druker maintained during his closing arguments that the case was not about homeowners' right to protect their property, but about when a person is justified in using deadly force to do so.

"What really took place here was a case of vigilantism," he said after the verdict. "A 13-year-old boy was killed because a man was enraged."

Anguiano's aunt, who asked not to be named, said in Saturday's editions of the Laredo Morning Times that she was disappointed with the verdict.

"The state fought the case the way it should have," she said. "There was a sufficient amount of evidence, and I thought that some of the jurors would be a father or a mother, and perhaps they would think about this happening to them."

Gonzalez had endured several break-ins at his trailer when the four boys, ranging in age from 11 to 15, broke in. Gonzalez, who was in a nearby building at the time, went into the trailer and confronted the boys with a 16-gauge shotgun. Then he forced the boys, who were unarmed, to their knees, attorneys on both sides say.

The boys say they were begging for forgiveness when Gonzalez hit them with the barrel of the shotgun and kicked them repeatedly. Then, the medical examiner testified, Anguiano was shot in the back at close range. Two mashed Twinkies and some cookies were stuffed in the pockets of his shorts.

Another boy, Jesus Soto Jr., now 16, testified that Gonzalez ordered them at gunpoint to take Anguiano's body outside.

Gonzalez said he thought Anguiano was lunging at him when he fired the shotgun.

http://tinyurl.com/4afspn

Sounds like cold blooded murder to me. I believe the boys should have been punished. But this, is horrible!
Report Spam   Logged

Share on Bluesky Share on Facebook

Camillusk
Guest

Badges: (View All)
« Reply #1 on: September 30, 2008, 02:53:03 pm »

Wow. This is tough. If you are legally entitled to use deadly force when your home is broken into, are you supposed to wait until you know the age of the intruder? And even then are you supposed to evaluate how threatening the intruder may be before you take action? Just some of my first thoughts. I don't know how I would react. Very interesting story...
Report Spam   Logged
blueyes
Crown holder
Royalty
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 7774




Badges: (View All)
« Reply #2 on: September 30, 2008, 03:20:56 pm »

The story made it sound like he had them at gunpoint. If that was the case, he could have called the police.
Although the boys who lived may have lied.
Report Spam   Logged

Camillusk
Guest

Badges: (View All)
« Reply #3 on: September 30, 2008, 03:26:20 pm »

Ahhh. I didn't read thoroughly. That's a different story.
Report Spam   Logged
Tuberavens
Guest

Badges: (View All)
« Reply #4 on: September 30, 2008, 08:46:39 pm »

Here In Jersey If a person brakes into you house and gets hurt they can sue you ugly
Report Spam   Logged
blueyes
Crown holder
Royalty
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 7774




Badges: (View All)
« Reply #5 on: September 30, 2008, 09:11:04 pm »

That is insanity! I don't know how they come up with some of these stupid laws.
Report Spam   Logged

Tuberavens
Guest

Badges: (View All)
« Reply #6 on: September 30, 2008, 09:32:24 pm »

I did not believe it till cop told me it is true.

my place was broken into the cop told me you can not touch the person who broke in.
Report Spam   Logged
Ikarus
Chef de Cuisine
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 505




Badges: (View All)
« Reply #7 on: September 30, 2008, 10:04:04 pm »

Litigation in the Garden States has reached absurd levels.

It's sad but true.
Report Spam   Logged

Tuberavens
Guest

Badges: (View All)
« Reply #8 on: October 01, 2008, 06:33:36 am »

I am still trying to figure out why?
Report Spam   Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
SMF For Free - Create your own Forum
Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy